Measurement of Wellhead Fatigue
EVENT: OTC
1 May 2015
Fatigue loading on subsea wellheads has been increasing in recent years through the use of larger and heavier BOP stacks and the longer drilling durations needed for deeper wells and to extend production lives. This challenge has prompted the widespread implementation of monitoring systems to confirm predictions of wellhead fatigue and ensure well operations are conducted safely.
Monitoring system design requirements, data processing and evaluation of field measurements from a number of wells are described. Monitoring systems for measurement of wellhead fatigue require careful planning. Considerations include what to measure, instrument accuracy, power, data transmission, methods of attachment, data processing and data storage. The evaluation will determine the suitability of off-the-shelf equipment or the need for application specific devices. An example assessment of the requirements of measurement devices from which wellhead fatigue can be derived is given that demonstrates the importance of integrated consideration of instruments, resolution and data processing methods in the selection and design of the system. The assessment presented here has widespread application across subsea wellhead systems worldwide.
A variety of different approaches to monitoring wellhead system fatigue have been attempted. These include motion measurement, using devices located in varying positions along the wellhead and BOP, to strain measurement of the conductor pipe. Examples of real systems used in different geographical locations and the wellhead system fatigue damage derived from the data are presented. The improved understanding of wellhead behaviour and modelling improvements that can be made from the use of the data obtained are demonstrated. Finally, comparisons of response measurements from different devices demonstrate the importance of instrument positioning. This finding provides a driver for the design of future instrumentation systems and an important pointer for verification of wellhead fatigue damage derived from previous monitoring programs.
The work presented here provides a systematic basis for design and implementation of wellhead fatigue monitoring systems. Furthermore, the field measurements obtained demonstrate some potential pitfalls to be avoided and how to get maximum value from the data obtained.
Author
Alex Rimmer
Director, UK
About
Alex joined 2H Offshore in 2004 and has been a UK Director since 2011, based in 2H’s London Office. He is jointly responsible for 2H’s European offices and engineering activities across the EMEA regions.
Alex is a Chartered Engineer with the IMechE and holds a first-class Master of Engineering degree from the University of Bath. He has over 20 years of project execution and management experience developed at 2H and in previous roles.
He is a recognised subject matter expert in dynamic subsea system analysis and engineering and provides technical oversight and consultancy to a broad range of deep and shallow water energy projects. He specialises in all types of drilling, completion and production riser systems, as well as platform well and subsea well systems. For the past 5 years, he has primarily been driving forward 2H UK's floating wind (coupled analysis, power cables, moorings and anchor piles) and CCUS well activities, but continues to support the projects in oil and gas as well.
He has been involved in many challenging and innovative offshore subsea and renewable developments. His energy sector highlights include BP’s Block 31 PSVM and Total’s Kaombo hybrid riser detailed designs, Total’s West of Shetland UK subsea development and many of Aker BP’s well platforms in Norway. Renewable energy highlights include support to industry initiatives with ORE Catapult on floating wind HV power cables, and several pioneering wave energy and floating wind platforms and developments.
